NDP Plays Political Games with National Unity

The NDP's Unity Act states that if Quebec sovereigntists can garner 50%+1 of the votes in a referendum, or a bare majority, Quebec can form its own country. The bill would repeal the Clarity Act which was introduced in 1995 when Quebec came marginally short of separating from the rest of Canada and inherits the bulk of the views that were taken with the Sherbrooke Declaration of 2005. Additionally, this kind of policy would never work within the NDP itself.


“Instead of playing the games that the Liberals have always sought to play with this file and dropping us into the void as the Bloc would do, we’re proposing something constructive that is a positive way forward,” NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair said.

The Clarity Act was introduced by the recommendation of the Supreme Court of Canada during the last referendum to help the federal government establish what would be considered a legitimate referendum and what would be legitimate conditions for the country to separate. While the Clarity Act called for a "clear majority" in favor of a referendum with a clear question, no set threshold was put in place.

National Unity comes to the table as the Bloc Quebecois tabled private member's bill C-457 to abolish the Clarity Act. It also comes as Quebec's provincial government is currently run by the Parti Quebecois, which has a mandate to propose a referendum when it thinks the populace is ready.

The major parties are set to vote down the bill, but Bloc Quebecois leader Daniel Paillé is pleased with the NDP's commitment to replace the clarity act launching a bid to the party to start its implementation now.

“If they want to replace the Clarity Act, I invite them to abolish the Clarity Act,” he said.

With no set threshold in place, the NDP, as Liberal leadership candidate Justin Trudeau points out, is taking a calculated gamble.

"You cannot be half pregnant on the question of Canadian unity," Trudeau told reporters. "[NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair's] willingness to equivocate, his willingness to be open to a 50 per cent plus one vote on sovereignty takes us back in a direction that we don't want to go. It's a very careful political calculation by him to appease his strong nationalist base in Quebec."

With a duty to run a country, it is noteworthy that national unity is not a political game and should not be used as a tactic to buy votes. However, Mulcair has made it clear how his party would handle a third referendum if they ever took office.

“The side that wins wins.” 

Mulcair went on to reference an upcoming referendum on Scotland's independence from Britain.

“That’s the rule that’s being followed by the mother of all parliaments in Westminster,” Mulcair said.

This isn't the rule used by his own party to modify aspects of its constitution. According to Article XVI on page 13 of the NDP's constitution, "This constitution may be amended by a two-thirds majority vote of all delegates present and voting at any Convention." If the NDP needs 2/3 majority of support to modify aspects of its own party, why would only 50%+1 be needed to decide the fate of the country? Do you have an answer for that question? Follow us and let us know what you think: Facebook, Twitter, Google+.

A New Year, A New Round of Bad Budgetary News

Money may no longer grow on trees but that hasn't stopped the Conservatives from spending it like there is no tomorrow. Don't let their austerity fool you, as they cut the services that are vital for the Canadian economy to function, they are funding new senators, a campaign to inform Canadians about the death of the penny, and funny enough, spending much more than the amount that they cut as part of the austerity package.

The Parliamentary Budget Office has released a new report that suggests that despite a 4% cut in direct federal government services, spending in bureaucracy is on an incline. Internal services such as communications, information technology, human resources and financial management rose 8%. In the end of the day, an austerity plan that was meant to tackle Canada's soaring deficit and hopefully one day restrain Canada's record debt has only resulted to a 0.6% decrease in spending for the first six months of this fiscal year which ends on March 31. The report adds that capital expenditures, particularly in the Department of Defense rose by nearly 7% in the first half of the fiscal year. 

This is an about face to what the Conservatives said they were going to do. Treasury Board President Tony Clement explained last year that direct services would not be effected by cuts as the bulk of cuts would be made to administration and bureaucracy which clearly hasn't happened. 

Conservative spending doesn't end there. Despite having the most competitive corporate tax rates and having a relatively stable economy, the Conservatives have opted to use taxpayers' money in times of fiscal restraint to pay for trips to China for some of Canada's top CEOs. The CEOs and the government defend the expenditure as a good investment as they try to open new business markets overseas. Given the amount of money that CEOs make and how essential these trade talks are for them, it is worth noting that a good investment is still a good investment if CEOs can cover the expenses themselves. With billions of dollars of bonuses and a flexible economic framework, there is no denying that this ounce of corporate welfare was not only a waste of taxpayers' money but it was unnecessary as the private sector would naturally have conducted those meetings and paid for the expenses of those meetings on its own. Ironically, while welfare was given to companies that don't need it, the media that joined the meetings were forced to pay their way. The Canadian Press was given a bill from the Privy Council of $4,607. 

While traveling can cost a pretty penny, the Conservatives have decided that pennies are too expensive - they also decided that plastic bills that stick together were a wise investment in creating new bills. Meanwhile, projected savings from deleting the coin have proven to be offset by other expenditures and it will be interesting to watch businesses adapt to the new rounding rules that only apply to cash exchanges. Meanwhile, some Canadians have been receiving info cards in the mail. The info cards detail the new rounding rules and state that the penny is too expensive. The irony of the matter is the price of printing and distributing those cards likely cost more than a penny and with their inflated budget of ad campaigns and mismanagement, one can find many ways to have kept the penny and saved the hardship of businesses and consumers that will result of the changes.

We all know that the Conservatives say they are for small government but we also know that their track record says otherwise. Adding 30 new MPs and having the largest senate appointment in Canada's history - not to mention all the new bureaucrats in the Prime Minister's Office - may have been enough of an indicator that the government size would increase and that the amount we spend on pensions and salaries would too. Stephen Harper added five more friends to the senate in times of fiscal restraint (and even if the economy was cruising in surpluses this appointment would still be unnecessary). There is only 1 vacant seat left in the 125 seat Upper House and with 65 Conservative senators to date, Harper has reassured himself that the control he has over the senate will be long lasting and without any issues - he could have stopped about 20 appointments ago.

For those who are curious, here are the five new senators that were appointed.

• Denise Batters, a Regina lawyer and mental-health advocate whose late husband, former MP Dave Batters, committed suicide.

• Lynn Beyak, a small business owner from Dryden, Ont., with experience in real estate, insurance and tourism.

• Doug Black, a Calgary lawyer, as well as vice-chair and senior counsel of the law firm Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP.

• Victor Oh, a Mississauga, Ont., entrepreneur and president of Wyford Holdings, a property development and management business.

• David Wells, a St. John's executive who most recently served as deputy CEO of the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board. 

Source: CBC News

So much for senate reform... Perhaps we should abolish the Senate and adapt the House of Commons to assign back bench MPs the tasks that would be done in the senate - just a suggestion.

Canada is still in deficit, services are about to deteriorate and bureaucracy is at all time highs, are you happy with the Conservatives' handling of the economy? Follow us and let us know what you think: Facebook, Twitter, Google+.